Microsoft word - ovma survey on veterinary prescriptions.doc
OVMA Survey on Veterinary Prescriptions
Since late April, the Oregon Veterinary Medical Association has had ongoing discussion with the
Oregon Board of Pharmacy on the issue of pet prescriptions and the dispensing of products via an online outlet or brick and mortar pharmacy.
In order to obtain better information on what veterinary practices are experiencing across the state,
the OVMA conducted a survey through Survey Monkey.
Approximately 22% of the 525 practices in Oregon responded to the survey, with an overview
First – the good news
Veterinary clients in Oregon – for the most part – have good access to obtain medications for their
pets at their outlet of choice, whether that is a veterinary practice, an online business or a retail pharmacy. According to the practices that responded to the survey, a significant majority of them will, at the client’s request, write a prescription to be filled outside of the practice. In addition, most practices do not charge a prescription fee for this service.
When a retail pharmacist has a concern about a prescription issued by a veterinarian, a majority
will contact the veterinarian to discuss the issue. In some instances, veterinarians have established a good business relationship with a local pharmacist, and together they work hand-in-hand to meet the needs of the client and the best interests of the patient.
Second – the bad news
Regrettably, respondents to the survey have noted too many instances where retail pharmacies or
online outlets have overstepped their bounds with regard to the health and safety of the veterinary patient. This has included changing the prescribed dose of a medication or switching to a different product – both without contacting the attending veterinarian and obtaining his or her authorization. Other times a pharmacy will dispense the properly prescribed product by the veterinarian, but the pharmacist will counsel the client to reduce the dosage – often in half, especially for thyroid medications or Phenobarbital to control seizures in an epileptic patient.
When this occurs, the retail pharmacist steps outside of his or her scope of practice, and the
patient receives sub-therapeutic treatment for its condition. Retail pharmacists do not have the training or experience in veterinary pharmacology and are ill-equipped to counsel veterinary clients on the appropriate doses of medications, contraindications, side effects, and drug interactions.
It is important that retail pharmacists understand that cats and dogs are not little people. If a
pharmacist has a concern about a drug prescribed by a veterinarian, it is paramount that he or she call the veterinarian and ask for clarification about the prescription. A pharmacist should only change a veterinarian’s prescription after having fully discussed the issue and obtaining the veterinarian’s authorization.
Survey questions and responses
1. Do you honor a client’s request to have a prescription filled outside of the veterinary practice? Yes – 95% No – 5% Note: While an overwhelming majority of practices meet a client’s request to have the prescription
filled elsewhere, some practices have cited problems with online outlets and limit a prescription to a brick and mortar pharmacy.
2. Do you charge a fee when a client fills the prescriptions outside of the veterinary practice? Yes – 7% No – 93%
Note: The policies of most veterinary practices do not assess a fee for writing a prescription to be
filled outside of the clinic. A few practices indicated they had considered charging a fee but were concerned that it would not be accepted by the profession in general.
3. Have you experienced an instance where a retail pharmacy or an online outlet changed a
prescribed dosage or medication for your patient without your authorization?
Yes – 35% No – 65% 4. Has a patient experienced an adverse event that can be related to a change in dosage or type of
medication from your prescription as dispensed by an online outlet or a brick and mortar retail pharmacy?
Yes – 16.5% No – 83.5% 5. Has a retail pharmacy or online outlet ever contacted you to discuss concerns with a prescribed
dosage or type of medication for your client?
Case Examples
· Many respondents indicated they have encountered instances where retail pharmacists have
changed a prescribed insulin product to a lesser expensive insulin, believing that the two products were interchangeable, when, in fact, they were not.
In one example, the patient suffered serious complications, i.e. diabetic ketoacidosis. In other
instances, the patients received sub-therapeutic treatment for their diabetes until a recheck with their veterinarians caught the problem.
· A number of retail pharmacies lower the dosage of thyroid medications for companion animals
without contacting the attending veterinarian. Evidently, the retail pharmacists are equating an animal’s ability to absorb and metabolize the medication in the same manner as a human. There are distinct differences.
· A veterinarian diagnosed an older dog with epilepsy and prescribed 15 mg of Phenobarbital
twice daily. When the client arrived at the pharmacy to pick up the prescription, the pharmacist told her that the dosage was too high and that she should reduce it in half. With the sub-therapeutic treatment, the dog continued to suffer from seizures, until several weeks later when the veterinarian discovered the problem upon a recheck. The dog was euthanized.
· A veterinarian prescribed Itraconazole (Sporanox) to treat ringworm in a cat. However, the
retail pharmacy did not carry Sporanox but dispensed a compounded product that is unreliable and poorly absorbed in cats. The client elected to continue using the compounded product, but experienced a treatment failure. The patient’s ringworm subsequently responded to Terbinafine.
· A practitioner was treating a patient with a collapsed trachea and issued a prescription for a
cough suppressant. The R/X was written for Hycodan tablets (Hydrocodone Bitartrate and Homatropine). The pharmacy did not carry this product and instead substituted a product with Hydrocodone and Acetominophen without consulting the veterinarian.
Fortunately, the prescription was for a dog and NOT a cat. Acetominophen generally is not
recommended for treatment in dogs, as high dosages can cause irreversible liver damage. There are NO safe dosages for cats.
In a separate instance, a veterinary technician mentioned to a pharmacist that her senior dog had
arthritis and asked what he would recommend to help relieve the animal’s discomfort and pain. The pharmacist suggested high doses of Tylenol (active ingredient – acetaminophen).
· A retail pharmacist dispensed Advantix (which is labeled for use ONLY in dogs) to a cat owner.
Even If the product were approved for cats, the dispensed dosage would have been incorrect.
· A veterinarian wrote a prescription for Azithromycin 50 mg PO BID, but the retail pharmacist
sent the client home with Azathioprine instead. After one week the cat had severe bone marrow suppression and ultimately died. The veterinarian believes this was an honest mistake.
· A veterinarian prescribed propylene glycol for a hyperkeratotic nose problem in a Labrador
Retriever. The dog’s owner declined having the prescription filled when the retail pharmacist told her that the veterinarian had prescribed antifreeze which would kill the dog. (Ethylene glycol is in antifreeze, not propylene glycol). The veterinarian learned of this when she called the client for a progress report on the dog.
· A dog with an autoimmune disease was to be treated with the chemotherapy drug,
Azathioprene. Instead, the retail pharmacist dispensed the antibiotic Azithromycin. The patient relapsed and had to be euthanized.
The same veterinarian was treating a patient for an autoimmune condition, and the dog was
experiencing some hair loss. The client happened to be at a local pharmacy and mentioned the loss of hair to the pharmacist who suggested that she purchase Rogaine to treat the alopecia.
Minoxidil is the active ingredient in Rogaine and can cause cardiomyopathy in dogs – something
· A veterinarian diagnosed atypical mycobacterium in a cat and prescribed a liquid antibiotic for
the client to have filled at a nearby pharmacy. The dilution instructions by the retail pharmacist were significantly incorrect. As a result, the patient relapsed and was euthanized.
· At the request of his client, a veterinarian called in a prescription to a local pharmacy. However,
the pharmacist filled the prescription at 10 times the original dose. Several refills were called in to the pharmacy, and each time the medication that was dispensed was 10 times the correct dose. Because the medication was dispensed by a third party, the veterinarian never had an opportunity to see the prescription label and did not know the medication was being dispensed incorrectly. While the patient was on the incorrect dose, other medical and behavioral problems arose. The veterinarian conducted many tests on the patient before discovering it had received excessive doses of the drug. The owner incurred significant medical costs as a result.
· Over-the-counter products are also prescribed by veterinarians to treat patients with various
conditions and illnesses. In one case, the veterinarian prescribed 10,000 units of Vitamin K for a dog. When the client went to pick up the product at her nearby pharmacy, she mentioned the dose to her pharmacist who said that high amount of Vitamin K would kill the dog. This simply is untrue.
Other Concerns
· A number of respondents to the survey indicated that some retail pharmacists have changed
dosages or changed medications even when the prescription noted “No Substitution.”
· Veterinarians have also had problems with some pharmacists who fax the practice a “refill
authorization” but with incorrect or incomplete instructions. When the veterinarian “hand corrects”
the authorization and returns the prescription by fax to the pharmacy, the pharmacist tends to NOT correct the label.
· Many practices have had clients not fill a prescription issued to be dispensed by a pharmacy,
because the pharmacist explained to the client about human side effects with a particular drug. This has scared some clients from obtaining the necessary drug for their animal – even though the noted side effects do not occur in animal patients.
· It also is fairly common for both online outlets and brick and mortar pharmacies to switch a
prescribed product for another product because they happen to be out of the prescribed product.
LEO R. MCCAFFERTY, M.D., F.A.C.S. 580 South Aiken Avenue Suite 530 Pittsburgh, PA 15232 Phone: 412.687.2100 Skincare History Questionnaire Name: __________________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ City: _____________________________________ State:________
Republic of Korea Acceptance Conditions Acceptance Conditions Letter-Post 1. Small packets and letters containing articles subject to customs duty (1) Maximum weight limit: 2 kilograms (2) Letters containing articles subject to customs duty. Whether admitted or not: Yes. (3) Number of CN23 customs declarations needed: It is not required when the value of the contents is less than