FORT PECK TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS
FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION
ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES
In the Matter of the Custody of
L. S. R. C. (d.o.b. 09/27/00)
Appeal No. 387
A minor Indian child
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REVIEW
A Petition for Review
having been timely filed on October 26, 2001
by Mary L. Zemyan, Esq.
Wolf Point, on behalf of Roberta Ann (Missi)
and Alfred Charette
, paternal grandparents of subject
minor Indian child from an Order Dissolving Restraining Order and Establishing Custody Plan
the Honorable Juanita Azure
, presiding. Said petition is denied for the reasons set forth below.
Paternal grandparents contend that the Tribal Court did not act in the best interest of L.S.R.C.
infant daughter of Mark Charette and Thomisina (Tammy) Hapa, who lived together until July, 2001,
but were never married. This contention arises following an order of the Tribal Court which dissolved a
previously issued temporary order of the Court which had granted sole physical custody to them and
restrained the child's mother from contact with her infant daughter. They urge this Court to review the
order based upon 1) the mother had made a mistake in over-medicating the child while in the mother's
custody (inferring that the mother could not be trusted to provide adequate care and support) and 2) the
Tribal Court failed to provide for the child's safety and welfare while in the mother's unsupervised
Mark Charette (hereafter 'Mark') and Thomasina (Tammy) Hapa (hereafter 'Tammy') are the parents of L.S.R.C.
, born September 27, 2000. Mark and Tammy lived together until July, 2001 at which time
physical custody of L.S.R.C.
was given to Mark's parents, Roberta Ann (Missi) and Alfred Charette.
Following a dispute between Tammy and Missi, both filed custodial petitions on July 31, 2001. A full
hearing was held on September 24, 2001, after which the Tribal Court, Judge Juanita Azure, presiding,
found that both Tammy and Missi were suitable care providers. Accordingly, joint legal and physical
custody of L.S.R.C.
was granted to both Tammy and Missi. During one of Tammy's custodial weeks,
she mistakenly over-medicated L.S.R.C.
with tegretol, a prescribed seizure drug. Missi filed for an
emergency hearing and obtained an ex parte order from Judge Rita Weeks, who, in the same order,
placed the matter on Judge Azure's calendar for hearing on October 22, 2001.
Judge Azure conducted the second hearing on October 25, 2001 at which Tammy admitted to having
made a mistake in giving L.S.R.C.
medication. In her findings, Judge Azure stated that Tammy had
made a "serious mistake". Judge Azure went on to order the temporary restraining order dissolved and
ordered that both Tammy and Missi to meet with Mary Fullerton, a health care professional, "to discuss
their concerns regarding the child and her medication in order to prevent any future problems in this
area." Judge Azure also ordered that a statement be furnished the Court to confirm that the meeting had
taken place. She then awarded alternating weeks of physical custody of L.S.R.C.
to both Tammy and
Missi "under further order of the Court."
It appears that this case is under continuing review of the Tribal Court which raises a question as to
whether the matter is ripe for review in this Court. Nonetheless, we find nothing in the record that
would support the notion that the Tribal Court abused its discretion when dissolving the temporary
restraining order. On the contrary, the Tribal Court conducted two full custodial hearings, yet the petitioners herein would have this Court review the latter of those hearings which dissolved an ex parte order which was made on an emergency basis without benefit of any 'live testimony'. We see absolutely no basis for doing so.
After careful review of all of the record, this Court finds no legal basis upon which to grant the grandparent's request for review.
IT IS NOW THEREFOR THE ORDER OF THIS COURT:
The Petition for Review herein, captioned as shown above, is denied and al Tribal Court orders heretofore stayed or not acted upon because of, or pursuant to, the pendency of this petition, are herewith restored and shal be given ful force and effect without further delay.
FOR THE FORT PECK COURT OF APPEALS
Gary P. Sullivan
MANDATORY GEAR LIST The following is a list of equipment that you should have, at a minimum, for the duration of the event. Mandatory Gear will be checked at Registration before the event starts Spot checks will take place before participants start each day For your own safety and in the interests of fair play, make sure you have all Mandatory Gear before you leave the Start or O
FUSSPILZ Niemand redet gerne darüber, aber viele tragen ihn mit sich herum – der Fusspilz. Der Fusspilz ist die weitaus am meisten verbreitetste Pilzinfektion. Fusspilz ist ebenso hartnäckig wie unangenehm. Er schleicht sich klammheimlich zwischen die Zehen, unter die Nägel und macht sich an der Fusssohle breit. Fast ein Viertel der Bevölkerung der Schweiz leidet darunter. Der Fusspilz